Breaking US/World News and Analysis

Category: US Politics (Page 2 of 2)

Thanks for the Air Pollution Bill and Hillary!

Hillary Clinton and the Politics of Rape

Feminists were supposed to make the world better for women. Sadly, thanks to the example of Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton, things are getting worse for women, much worse. Clinton stated:

“CLINTON:  You know, I’ve devoted a lot of my public life to advocating for women’s rights being human rights, and making the case that we have to do everything we can, through laws, regulations, culture, to change the still-existing stereotypes that hold women back.”

Unfortunately, power comes before principle with Mrs. Clinton. Her husband has been involved in more alleged sexual assaults than any politician in American history. He has also been accused of rape multiple times. It seems these accusations have trailed him his entire adult life:


  • Eileen Wellstone, 19-year-old English woman who said Clinton sexually assaulted her after she met him at a pub near the Oxford where the future President was a student in 1969. A retired State Department employee, who asked not to be identified, confirmed that he spoke with the family of the girl and filed a report with his superiors. Clinton admitted having sex with the girl, but claimed it was consensual. The victim’s family declined to pursue the case;
  • In 1972, a 22-year-old woman told campus police at Yale University that she was sexually assaulted by Clinton, a law student at the college. No charges were filed, but retired campus policemen contacted by Capitol Hill Blue confirmed the incident. The woman, tracked down by Capitol Hill Blue last week, confirmed the incident, but declined to discuss it further and would not give permission to use her name;
  • In 1974, a female student at the University of Arkansas complained that then-law school instructor Bill Clinton tried to prevent her from leaving his office during a conference. She said he groped her and forced his hand inside her blouse. She complained to her faculty advisor who confronted Clinton, but Clinton claimed the student ”came on” to him. The student left the school shortly after the incident. Reached at her home in Texas, the former student confirmed the incident, but declined to go on the record with her account. Several former students at the University have confirmed the incident in confidential interviews and said there were other reports of Clinton attempting to force himself on female students;
  • Broaddrick, a volunteer in Clinton’s gubernatorial campaign, said he raped her in 1978. Mrs. Broaddrick suffered a bruised and torn lip, which she said she suffered when Clinton bit her during the rape;
  • From 1978-1980, during Clinton’s first term as governor of Arkansas, state troopers assigned to protect the governor were aware of at least seven complaints from women who said Clinton forced, or attempted to force, himself on them sexually. One retired state trooper said in an interview that the common joke among those assigned to protect Clinton was “who’s next?”. One former state trooper said other troopers would often escort women to the governor’s hotel room after political events, often more than one an evening;   (MORE)

One would think a professed feminist would be outraged at a man, in a position of power, using that position to force women into having sex with him. Hillary, however, does what every other political operative would do. She deals with the accuser as a political threat.

“I think we’re going to find some other things. And I think that when all of this is put into context, and we really look at the people involved here, look at their motivations and look at their backgrounds, look at their past behavior, some folks are going to have a lot to answer for.” (Link)

Everyone seems to have a lot to answer for when it comes to the alleged serial sex offender that once occupied the White House. Everyone but Bill Clinton that is.

Should the multiple alleged sex assaults be a major campaign issue since Bill Clinton isn’t running in this election? The answer is yes, not so much because of Bill Clinton’s multiple alleged sex crimes, but because Hillary Clinton betrayed all women with her “Blame the Victims” media campaign.

It would have been bad enough if she had stood back and did nothing, but to launch multiple smear campaigns against the accusers shows a desperate attempt to place political aspirations above Feminist principles.


Clinton's Christmas came and went with the Communist Chinese.

Hillary Clinton, Treason, and the Chinese Communist Lippo Group

“Corruption controversies have marked Riady’s business career. In the 1996 presidential campaign, James Riady was a major campaign contributor to the Democratic Party. In 1998, the United States Senate conducted an investigation of the finance scandal of the 1996 U.S. presidential campaign. James Riady was indicted and pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations by himself and his corporation. He was ordered to pay an 8.6 million U.S. dollar fine for contributing foreign funds to the Democratic Party, the largest fine ever levied in a campaign finance case. In 2008, Riady’s close business associate Billy Sindoro, an executive of Riady’s Jakarta-based First Media, was filmed handing bribes to officials of Indonesia’s anti-monopoly agency, the KPPU. Riady and First Media were then in a business dispute with a Malaysian company and the KPPU was deliberating that dispute. Sindoro was later found guilty of corruption. In December 2008, the Riady-owned Jakarta Globe published a sympathetic portrait of Sindoro in prison where he lamented he would not be able to spend Christmas with his family.” (source)
“The purpose of the contributions was to obtain various benefits from various campaign committees and candidates for Lippo Group and LippoBank, including: access, meetings, and time with politicians, elected officials, and other high-level government officials; contacts and status for Lippo Group and LippoBank with business and government leaders in the United States and abroad; business opportunities for Lippo Group and defendant LippoBank; government policies which would inure to the benefit of Lippo Group and defendant LippoBank, including Most Favored Nation status for China, open trade policies with Indonesia, normalization of relations with Vietnam, Community Reinvestment Act exemptions for LippoBank, a repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act which limited business opportunities for LippoBank, and a relaxation of Taiwanese restrictions on investment by foreign banks; the deposit of funds into LippoBank by political campaign committees and government agencies; and local government support for Lippo Group’s California property development projects which would in turn benefit LippoBank’s plans for expansion.”
Who needs spies when you can own a whole political party? Treason is a dangerous word, but, in essence, it means selling out your country to a foreign power. For cash or some other favor.
“Testimony before Sen. Fred Thompson’s committee indicated that the Lippo Group is in fact a joint venture of China Resources, a trading and holding company “wholly owned” by the Chinese communist government and used as a front for Chinese espionage operations. China Resources investments in Lippo grew during the course of the Clinton administration, coinciding with illegal six-figure Lippo contributions to Clinton’s cash machine. These contributions seem to not only have bought Lippo employee John Huang a job in the Commerce Department, but special consideration for Lippo business interests at the highest level of the Clinton administration.
Americans should feel safer knowing that a hostile foreign government has control at the highest level of their Executive Branch. Who needs a President when you can be ruled by the Communist Chinese directly?
Riady was exhiled until 2009, when the Clinton’s used their influence to get him back into the U.S.
“Last year, however, the Indonesian mogul finally made it to Arkansas. He traveled there during the first of two previously unreported trips he made in 2009 to the United States. He was allowed in only after receiving a waiver from a rule that forbids entry to foreigners guilty of “a crime involving moral turpitude,” a term that government lawyers generally interpret to include fraud.
Riady’s return to the United States poses a prickly question for Hillary Clinton’s State Department: How and why did a foreign billionaire stained by Clinton-era scandals get a U.S. visa after being kept out for so long under the Bush administration?
Curious how much Chinese Communist money is running Hillary Clinton’s campaign for President? Just go back and look at Bill Clinton’s campaign.
“During the period of August 1992 through October 1992, shortly after Riady pledged $1 million in support of Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton’s campaign for the Presidency of the United States, contributions made by Huang were reimbursed with funds wired from a foreign Lippo Group entity into an account Riady maintained at Lippo Bank and then distributed to Huang in cash.

Was Hillary Clinton’s Political Career Launched by Communist China?

Hillary Clinton worked for the lawyer that represented the Radical Left Black Panthers, who worshiped Mao and his little red book. She also worked for the legal head of the American Communist Party.

As we prepare for the next wikileaks dump, the real question is whether or not Hillary Clinton used her position at the State Department to sell out American interests to the Communist Chinese.

“During the summer of 1971, Mrs. Clinton writes in her book, she was a law clerk at the Oakland firm of Treuhaft, Walker and Burnstein. “I spent most of my time working for Mal Burnstein researching, writing legal motions and briefs for a child custody case,” she said. In fact, however, the public record shows that Clinton worked for Robert Treuhaft, a member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) and Harvard-trained lawyer for the party.
Citing public sources, Peter Flaherty’s book, The First Lady (Vital Issues Press, 1996), says that “Hillary was recommended to Treuhaft by some of her professors at Yale. She was looking for a ‘movement’ law firm to work at for the summer. As it turns out, Hillary would continue her association and support of the Black Panther cause while working as a law clerk for Treuhaft.” Flaherty notes that Treuhaft told Herb Caen of the San Francisco Examiner, “That was the time we were representing the Black Panthers, and she worked on that case.”
The Black Panthers handed out Mao’s little red book.
“Founded in Oakland, California, by Bobby Seale and Huey P. Newton on October 15, 1966, the organization initially set forth a doctrine calling primarily for the protection of African American neighborhoods from police brutality.  But the Black Panther Party’s objectives and philosophy expanded and evolved rapidly during the party’s existence. The organization’s leaders passionately espoused socialist and communist (largely Maoist) doctrines…
Mrs. Clinton’s involvement with Treuhaft is no secret, although Hillary clearly doesn’t want to talk about it. A New York Times obituary of Treuhaft, who died in 2001, said that he had “accepted a young Yale lawyer named Hillary Rodham (now Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton) as an intern.” A British newspaper, the London Times, said that “generations of liberal lawyers were groomed under his [Treuhaft’s] tutelage, including a young Yale law student named Hillary Rodham.”
Its no secret that Communist Russia and China were the secret money behind many of the radical groups of the 1960s. As the most disruptive radical group of the 1960s, the Black Panthers used the same mantra of police brutality to justify their violence against others.
“Federal Bureau of Investigation  Director J. Edgar Hoover called the party “the greatest threat to the internal security of the country,” and he supervised an extensive program of counter-organizing that included surveillance, eavesdropping, infiltration, police harassment, perjury, and a laundry list of other tactics designed to incriminate party members and drain the organization of resources and manpower.” Through these tactics, it was thought that their potential for further advancement would diminish and probability of continuing to serve as a threat to the general power structure of the US, or maintain a presence as a strong undercurrent would shrink.” While party membership started to decline during Huey Newton’s 1968 manslaughter  trial, the Black Panther Party collapsed altogether in the early 1970s. Writers such as former Communist Party USA member Angela Davis and writer and political activist Ward Churchill have alleged that law enforcement officials went to great lengths to discredit and destroy the organization, including assassination.”
Clinton’s involvement with the Communists was a historical fact. The same as her involvement with the radical Communist backed Black Panther group.
“Former sixties radical David Horowitz says that both Hillary Rodham and Bill Lann Lee, who later became President Clinton’s head of the U.S. Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, helped organize the pro-Panther demonstrations at Yale.”
She notes a meeting in 1969 with David Mixner of the Vietnam Moratorium Committee, an anti-Vietnam war protest group that came under investigation by the House Internal Security Subcommittee for its involvement with communists and backing from Hanoi. Mixner would go on to become a leading homosexual activist, adviser to and friend of President Clinton. He was credited with delivering some six million votes to Clinton in 1992.
It was during these early years that the Clinton’s probably sold out to the Communist Chinese and Russians who were in a proxy war with the United States in Viet-Nam.
Clearly, the Clinton’s have profited greatly from their close relationship with Communist China:

“The (Clinton) foundation has raised at least $42 million from foreign governments – and according to an analysis by CBS News – at least $170 million from foreign entities and individuals.

One donor – Rilin Enterprises- pledged $2 million in 2013 to the Clinton Foundation’s endowment. The company is a privately-held Chinese construction and trade conglomerate and run by billionaire Wang Wenliang, who is also a delegate to the Chinese parliament. Public records show the firm has spent $1.4 million since 2012, lobbying Congress and the State Department. The firm owns a strategic port along the border with North Korea and was also one of the contractors that built the Chinese embassy in Washington.

Further complicating Clinton’s ties to her family foundation, is that when she was secretary of state, the foundation had a built-in infrastructure – in the State Department and the White House – to vet donations from foreign entities. That mechanism hasn’t traditionally existed within a presidential candidate’s campaign stricture.”

With the next Wikileaks dump, we would expect to see much more incriminating evidence that shows that Clinton’s loyalties are to her wallet, not the American people.



Yes Virginia, Ted Cruz is a Globalist.

Ted Cruz meets with the Father of Modern Globalism, Henry Kissinger.

Cruz graduated from Princeton University, New Jersey, in 1992, and from Harvard Law School, Massachusetts, in 1995. From 1999 to 2003, he served in various political appointee positions: the Director of the Office of Policy Planning at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), an Associate Deputy Attorney General at the United States Department of Justice, and a Domestic Policy Advisor to George W. Bush on the 2000 George W. Bush Presidential campaign.

Of course Ted Cruz, who was born in Canada, is ineligible for POTUS under the Constitution, which states on US born citizens can be President. That said, Cruz is a Globalist hiding behind correct Constitutional principles. A wolf in sheep’s clothing as it were. Cruz’s wife is a member of the Globalist Think Tank, the Council on Foreign Relations.

“In the Council on Foreign Relations’ Task Force Report, Building a North American Community, guess who is listed as a Task Force member? None other than Ted Cruz’s wife, Heidi Cruz. It states:

HEIDI S. CRUZ is an energy investment banker with Merrill Lynch in Houston, Texas. She served in the Bush White House under CFR member, Dr. Condoleezza Rice as the Economic Director for the Western Hemisphere at the National Security Council, as the Director of the Latin America Office at the U.S. Treasury Department, and as Special Assistant to Ambassador Robert B. Zoellick, U.S. Trade Representative. Prior to government service, Ms. Cruz was an investment banker with J.P. Morgan in New York City.” (Link)

Today, Heidi Cruz is the head of the Southwest Region in the Investment Management Division of Goldman, Sachs & Co. She has taken time off to assist her husband in his campaign for president. About Goldman Sachs… President Obama’s top donor in 2008 was Goldman Sachs, and in 2009, Obama bailed out Wall Street. Goldman Sachs ranks dead last for reputation, and according to the Free Beacon, is the second largest corporate donor to Hillary Clinton.

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) calls the NAU, the North American Community. In reality, it is the joining of Canada, America and Mexico into one big super state, just as Europe was joined into one big European Union. Quite obviously, Donald Trump’s comments about illegal criminal aliens has jeopardized the plan that has been in the works since 2006, and even before. The global elite, through the direct operations of Bush and his administration are responsible.

Robert Pastor, a CFR director and key architect in creation of the NAU, said in the January/February 2004 issue of Foreign Affairs magazine: “NAFTA was merely the first draft of an economic constitution for North America.” He further called on the North American Community to:

  • Merge “immigration and refugee policies”
  • Establish a continental NAU “security perimeter”
  • Transfer $100 billion to Mexico in 10 years for “infrastructure development”
  • Create Security and Prosperity Partnership institutions to execute executive, legislative and judicial powers
  • Create a North American passport.

Pastor also called the current concept of “sovereignty” obsolete and said U.S., Canadian, and Mexican citizens need to be “reeducated” to view themselves as “North Americans.”

Although Ted Cruz has stated that Heidi was only involved with the Task Force as a dissenting voice, her own written words tell the truth:

In the last part of the Task Force’s report, “Additional and Dissenting Views,” Heidi S. Cruz wrote (pp. 33-34):

“I support the Task Force report and its recommendations aimed at building a safer and more prosperous North America. Economic prosperity and a world safe from terrorism and other security threats are no doubt inextricably linked. While governments play an invaluable role in both regards, we must emphasize the imperative that economic investment be led and perpetuated by the private sector. There is no force proven like the market for aligning incentives, sourcing capital, and producing results like financial markets and profit-making businesses. This is simply necessary to sustain a higher living standard for the poorest among us—truly the measure of our success. As such, investment funds and financing mechanisms should be deemed attractive instruments by those committing the capital and should only be developed in conjunction with market participants.”

Americans need to understand that the Republican Party is divided on the issues of a Global Super State, controlled by the wealthy Oligarchs and their Central Banks, versus American Nationalism, which supports the Constitution and Bill of Rights as written, without Globalist modification.

The majority of Republicans have rejected the Globalist dream of Henry Kissinger, George Bush, Mitt Romney and other Oligarchs. Its time to forget their ally, Ted Cruz as well. Time to move on and focus on the General Election and those who are actually their Party’s candidates.


Corrupt Media Monopoly Behind America’s Race Warriors

No Corrupt Politicians, Judges or Lawyers were harmed in the Dallas Shooting, or any other racially charged shooting for that matter. Divide and Conquer is the tried and true method of the Evil that now rules over this world of ours. Innocent people always pay the price for their overlords lust for greed and absolute power.

People are to too busy hating each other to focus on their crimes against humanity, which include inciting riots, genocide, conspiracy, robbery, larceny, perjury, treason , etc…

Either that or they are distracted by their TV shows and movies that glorify sex, porn and gratuitous violence or gore. People with vices are people that are easily manipulated and controlled.

If you are wondering who the corporate sponsors of America’s Race War are, look below:

media infographic

Declaration of Independence, Tyranny & Property

Signing the Magna Charta

                        Signing the Magna Charta

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

So begins the most important political statement ever written. Simply stated, when two parties dissolve their political relationship the aggreged party should explain why they are leaving the relationship.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

It was originally written Life, Liberty and Property, but was changed because slaves are forbidden from property ownership. Yet, property ownership and Due Process remain the distinguishing characteristic that define a free people.

Due Process means that the Government cannot just confiscate your property, liberty or life without the consent of a jury of your peers. It dates back to the Magna Carta, when the Aristocracy challenged the absolute Monarchy in England and won.

Clause 39 of Magna Carta provided:

“No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.[

It was reemphasized in the Bill of Rights in our Constitution.

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.” (7th Amendment-US Constitution)

In other words, a jury of your peers must decide whether someone can take your property lawfully. The same applies to criminal matters.

The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

Again, it was restated in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.

“nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” (14th Amendment)

When property, life and liberty  can be taken without a Jury Trial of your Peers you are officially no longer a free people and Tyranny has replaced your Democracy or Republic. Tyrant and Terror go together. Only fear can lead a once free people to give up their rights to their government unlawfully.


Is Donald Trump a Successful Businessman?

In politics, opponents like to emphasize the negative and ignore the positive. Now we see Donald Trump being lambasted for his business failings. What most people that never built a business don’t realize, is that you must fail your way to the top.

Take Warren Buffet, who lost $200 billion dollars when he bought a company called Berkshire Hathaway. At the time Berkshire Hathaway was a textile Mill.

And then there is Mitt Romney, arch-nemesis of Donald Trump who saw 22% of Bain Capital’s investments go bankrupt while he was its leader. As one researcher put it: “Trump has 515 subsidiary companies that he owns. Trump has also had more successful companies than just those 515 that he has sold, but let’s just use that number anyway. So at most Trump has had around 9 failed or bankrupt businesses, that puts his success rate at 98.3%.”

The reality is that 90% of new start-ups fail. So anyone with an 11% success rate starting companies is above average. Its the perils of a global marketplace where it can take months or years to get a product into production, after the demand for it has disappeared.

Trump is successful because he sticks to his core business, which is Real Estate,

“The majority of Trump’s fortune is derived from real-estate holdings that include a partnership with Vornado Realty Trust in Manhattan’s 1290 Sixth Ave. and 555 California St. in San Francisco; resorts such as the Mar-a-Lago and Trump Doral resorts in Florida; and Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue in New York, according to the Bloomberg index. Other properties include Turnberry in Scotland and Doonbeg in Ireland, both golf courses.” (Bloomberg)

The great thing about golf courses is that they can be easily turned into housing developments. Bloomberg estimates Trump’s wealth at 2.6 billion. Not where Berkshire Hathaway is, but hardly a failure.

In the end, business success is measured by an increase in net worth, not by failures or successes. As long as you are worth more this year than last year, you are successful.

Clinton and Trump both Need to “Dish the Dirt”

By J.R. Stone


Donald Trump took 13.3 million votes in the Republican Primary. Hillary Clinton won 15,729,913. While Trump exceeded George Bush’s Primary victory by almost 3 million votes, and set a new record in an extremely hostile and crowded field, Hillary lost almost 5 million votes from 2008, when she had the support of over 18 million Democrats who voted in that Primary . In 2008 she also ran against Barack Obama, a much more charismatic candidate than Bernie Sanders.

Now lets look at the total turnout. The Democrats had 27.7 million voters turn out for their primary. The Republicans had over 28.5 million voters turn out.

According to recent polls, Clinton loses 20% of the Sanders people to Donald Trump. Another 10% will just stay home.  That’s a loss of 3.59 million Democrats in the General Election for Hillary.

Clinton also posts higher negatives among likely voters in the Fall. She has a 61% negative rating versus his 56%. His negatives are falling, hers are going up.

The real question comes back to who can motivate their base. Hillary will have to move hard left to bring Bernie supporters out in the Fall. This will alienate Republican and Independents. Trump can move more to the middle and attract more Democrats and Independents.

The key for both is to drive up the negative opinion the public has about their opponent. This will lead to probably the most negative campaign in US history. Because most voters view Trump as an outsider, they will want him to dish the dirt on Hillary, who most view as a Washington insider.

Hillary, on the other hand, will be forced to use outside PACS to attack Trump and play on her femininty. In other words, she will be forced to portray herself as a helpless victim, not a role she is comfortable playing.

The other wild card is the Vice President spot. If Hillary picks Sanders as a running mate, it solidifies her party but alienates Republicans and Independents. If Trump picks Kasich, he solidifies his base and unites with the Republican establishment. Plus, he wins Ohio, a key state in the General Election.

Hillary, on the other hand, gains nothing with a Conservative or Moderate running mate. She has to dominate the ticket.

Again, she needs to drive up Trump’s negatives and hope he doesn’t drive up hers. Expect the attacks to grow more frequent and Partisans to grow more militant. Social media will be the primary battleground, and most will stand back and let both sides duke it out.



Hillary Could Lose It All!


Hillary Rodham Clinton

By: J. R. Stone

Hillary Clinton came with big expectations. She came to win. Now it appears she could leave empty handed.  It all comes down to California and its winner take all, 475 candidates.

If Bernie wins in California he will have crossed 2,017 mark in the delegate count. Only 2,363 delegates are needed to win. It will also mean that Bernie has won more delegate votes from Democratic Voters than Hillary. Hillary has won 1769 delegate votes in the Primary so far.

Clinton is banking on the 541 committed Super Delegates to push her over the top. These are Party Leaders that could vote for her at the convention.

Either way, if Bernie wins California it changes the whole nature of this race by pitting the Democratic rank and file against the Party Leaders at the Convention.

The only solution is a compromise with Bernie Sander voters to give him the Vice-President spot on the ticket.

Politics makes for strange bedfellows. We have seen stranger.

Page 2 of 2

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén